Keywords
trade associations
Health services providers
Cheating in collusion agreements
Categories
How to Cite
Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Downloads
Abstract
This article seeks to review the way in which trade associations are instrumentalized for the realization of collusive agreements. Distinguishing two main functions in the cases studied in Chile. First, a control tool of the members of the agreement. And, secondly, a way of equating the power of health care providers. Finally, this article comment on some jurisprudential views of the TDLC regarding trade associations.
References
Similar Articles
- César Ravinet Muñoz, Legal and contitutional analysis of the obligation to provide safe work environment in the chilen law within the social protection , Derecho Público Iberoamericano: No. 15 (2019)
- Agustín Silva Schultz, Toward a correct interpretatiton of article 151 of the administrative statute , Derecho Público Iberoamericano: No. 22 (2023)
- Guillermo Leighton García, Right of information to the patient. Practical Scope: Commentary on the Supreme Court ruling dated December 29, 2017 , Derecho Público Iberoamericano: No. 12 (2018)
- Héctor Pérez Bonifaz, Collusion: A jurisprudential analysis , Derecho Público Iberoamericano: No. 2 (2013)
- Leticia Suárez Donaire, Edgar Malebrán Guerra, Analysis of jurisprudence related to the asbesto's case in Chile and the violation of fundamental rights of victims , Derecho Público Iberoamericano: No. 22 (2023)
- Sergio Cea Cienfuegos, Patricio Morales Contardo, Legal nature of the chilean aviation administrative agencies and the aircraft commander , Derecho Público Iberoamericano: No. 4 (2014)
- Gladys Camacho Cépeda, Public-private partnership regulations on services and infrastructure provision: Looking at the reformulated model set by Law N° 20.410 , Derecho Público Iberoamericano: No. 4 (2014)
- María Laura Eberhardt, Citizen participation in public policy. The hearing in Argentina: The case of the “Gas Audience” (2016) , Derecho Público Iberoamericano: No. 10 (2017)
- Jaime Elgueta, Case Mémoli vs. Argentina: Judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights , Derecho Público Iberoamericano: No. 4 (2014)
- Santiago Sánchez González, The struggle against inequality: Affirmative actions and socioeconomic rights in USA and India , Derecho Público Iberoamericano: No. 4 (2014)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- María Fernanda Juppet Ewing, The State as an antitrust defendant , Derecho Público Iberoamericano: No. 6 (2015)
