Older People’s Experience of Autonomy with Durable Products

Main Article Content

Annika Maya-Rivero
Juan Carlos Ortiz-Nicolás

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of promoting autonomy in the design of products for older individuals. The aim was to better understand the autonomy experience of older people with durable products. This research utilizes a qualitative approach to study the experience in-depth and employed six instruments, including interviews, questionnaires, and a UX curve method, interaction qualities, the psychological needs it fulfills, and the emotions elicited through the product to investigate why and how a product, owned by the participant, promotes autonomy. Fourteen Mexican women over the age of 60, without cognitive impairment, Spanish-speaking and not affiliated with the design discipline, took part in the study. The results provide a detailed description of the characteristics of products that promote autonomy, the interaction properties involved, and the elements that structure the autonomy experience. The study identified an alignment between intrinsic motivations and the activity carried out with the product, ease of interaction, and excellent product performance as components of the experience. The experience of autonomy is pleasant and enhances well-being.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Annika Maya-Rivero, Faculty of Architecture, National Autonomous University of Mexico, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico

Annika is an Industrial Designer from Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México, IBERO CDMX. She holds a Design PhD and a master's in design from the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico. She was a postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Architecture Faculty of the National Autonomous University of Mexico. Her research areas are design for aging, design for longevity, and inclusive design. 

 

Juan Carlos Ortiz-Nicolás, Faculty of Architecture, National Autonomous University of Mexico, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico

Juan Carlos is an industrial designer who graduated from Centro de Investigaciones de Diseño Industrial at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CIDI-UNAM. He completed master's studies in interaction design and doctoral studies in the field of user experience. He is a professor of the Postgraduate in Architecture, Postgraduate, and Bachelor of Industrial Design. His publications cover the topics of user experience, social innovation, and design education. 

References

Bernardini, D. (2023). La segunda mitad. Los 50+ vivir la nueva longevidad. Penguin Random House.

Buedo-Guirado, C., & Rubio Rubio, L. (2018). La innovación del proyecto gerontológico desde la educación social: Efectos sobre bienestar psicológico y subjetivo de personas españolas institucionalizadas. Anales en Gerontología, 10(10), 36–55. https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/gerontologia/article/view/28023

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024

Desmet, P., & Fokkinga, S. (2020). Beyond Maslow’s pyramid: Introducing a typology of thirteen fundamental needs for human-centered design. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(3), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030038

Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x

Gentner, A., Bouchard, C., & Favart, C. (2013). Investigating user experience as a composition of components and influencing factors. In Proceedings of the International Association of Societies of Design Research Conference (Vol. 142).

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (1992). Discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

Hassenzahl, M. (2010). Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02191-6

Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and time. Suny Press.

Inter-American Convention on the Protection of the Human Rights of Older Persons. (2017). Convención Interamericana sobre la Protección de los Derechos Humanos de las Personas Mayores (ONU Registry No. 54318, February 27, 2017).

Kremer, S., & den Uijl, L. (2016). Studying emotions in the elderly. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Emotion Measurement (pp. 537–571). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100508-8.00022-9

Kujala, S., Roto, V., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Karapanos, E., & Sinnelä, A. (2011). UX Curve: A method for evaluating long-term user experience. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.06.005

Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3), 179–186.

Liu, L., Daum, C., Cruz, A. M., Neubauer, N., & Ríos Rincón, A. (2022). Ageing, technology, and health: Advancing the concepts of autonomy and independence. Healthcare Management Forum, 35(5), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704221110734

Lenz, E., Diefenbach, S., & Hassenzahl, M. (2013). Exploring relationships between interaction attributes and experience. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp. 126–135). ACM. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2513506.2513520

López García, M. M., Aguilar Pérez, L. S., & Mancilla Gallardo, M. de J. (2022). La calidad de vida percibida por personas adultas mayores urbanas no institucionalizadas en Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas. Anales en Gerontología, 14(14), 73–95. https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/gerontologia/article/view/50120

Miso, K., Random, V., Pozzar, R., Fombelle, P., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., & Jiang, M. (2022). Healthy aging adviser: Designing a service to support the life transitions and autonomy of older adults. The Design Journal, 25(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2021.2021662

Moilanen, T., Kangasniemi, M., Papinaho, O., Mynttinen, M., Siipi, H., Suominen, S., & Suhonen, R. (2021). Older people’s perceived autonomy in residential care: An integrative review. Nursing Ethics, 28(3), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020948115

Ortiz Nicolás, J. C., & Hernández López, I. (2018). Emociones específicas en la interacción persona-producto: Un método de identificación causal. Economía Creativa, 9, 122–162. https://doi.org/10.46840/ec.2018.09.06

Ortiz Nicolás, J. C., & Schoormans, J. (2019). The experience of autonomy with durable products. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19) (pp. 5–8). Delft, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.408

Ortiz Nicolás, J. C., & Schoormans, J. (2022). La experiencia de autonomía en la interacción persona-producto y su relación con el bienestar. In D. Bedolla Pereda (Ed.), Diseño y afectividad para fomentar bienestar integral (pp. 273–299). UAM, Unidad Cuajimalpa, División de Ciencias de la Comunicación y Diseño. https://doi.org/10.24275/9786072824669

Pacheco, C. N. (2019). Interaction aesthetics in and beyond the flow. Diseña, 15, 48–69. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.15.48-69

Reynolds, J. M. (2018). The extended body: On aging, disability, and well-being. The Hastings Center Report, 48(5), S31–S36. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.910

Rivero, A. M. (2018). Aging suit: An accessible and low-cost design tool for the gerontodesign. In Handbook of Research on Ergonomics and Product Design (pp. 56–69). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5234-5.ch004

Rubio Rubio, L., Dumitrache Dumitrache, C. G., Buedo-Guirado, C., & Cabezas Casado, J. L. (2018). Autoeficacia general percibida y bienestar psicológico. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 53, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2018.04.446

Sánchez-García, S., García-Peña, C., Ramírez-García, E., Moreno-Tamayo, K., & Cantú-Quintanilla, G. R. (2019). Decreased autonomy in community-dwelling older adults. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 14, 2041–2053. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S225479

Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.325

Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.

Tierney, L., & Beattie, E. (2020). Enjoyable, engaging and individualised: A concept analysis of meaningful activity for older adults with dementia. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 15(2), e12306. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12306

Van der Cammen, T. J. M., Albayrak, A., Voûte, E., & Molenbroek, J. F. M. (2017). New horizons in design for autonomous ageing. Age and Ageing, 46(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw181

World Health Organization. (2019). GHE: Life expectancy and healthy life expectancy. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-life-expectancy-and-healthy-life-expectancy

Zhou, C., Dai, Y., Huang, T., Zhao, H., & Kaner, J. (2022). An empirical study on the influence of smart home interface design on the interaction performance of the elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159105