Innovative Longevity Design through Boundary Object Integration
Main Article Content
Abstract
This descriptive study explores how Longevity Planning Blocks (LPBs) can serve as boundary objects to facilitate conversations and identify user needs in service design, thereby advancing the understanding of Design for Longevity (D4L) within financial planning, service innovation, and system design. Using constructivist grounded theory, we analyzed 69 one-hour in-person D4L service experiments with participants in Boston, USA, categorized by age: adulthood (25-54), pre-retirement (55-64), and post-retirement (65-84), with controls for gender balance, annual household income, savings, and investable assets. We identified six key considerations to improve the design of LPBs—adaptability, tangibility, modularity, learnability, unpredictability, and scalability—based on six emerging themes as core codes and 11 codes, which include understanding individuals’ needs, fostering point-to-talk behavior, presenting dynamic life stages dependent on individual preferences, incorporating unique lived experiences, prioritizing preparation over planning, and positioning a longevity coach as a continuous touchpoint for financial wellbeing, acting as a financial therapist. These insights highlight the value and challenges of using tangible artifacts as boundary objects to enhance D4L design and development.
Article Details
References
Anderson, M., & van Dijk, G. (Eds.). (2020). Explorers: Thoughts on Mapping in Design Research. STBY Ltd.
Attia, P., & Gifford, B. (2023). Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity (1st ed.). Harmony.
Bowker, G. C., Timmermans, S., Clarke, A. E., & Balka, E. (Eds.). (2015). Boundary Objects and Beyond: Working with Leigh Star. The MIT Press.
Carstensen, L. L. (2011). A Long Bright Future: Happiness, Health, and Financial Security in an Age of Increased Longevity (Rev. and updated). Public Affairs.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis - Introducing Qualitative Methods Series (Reprint ed.). Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2017). The power of constructivist grounded theory for critical inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416657105
Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). SAGE.
Coughlin, J. F. (2007). Disruptive demographics, design, and the future of everyday environments. Design Management Review, 18(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2007.tb00083.x
Coughlin, J. F. (2019). Planning for 8,000 days of retirement: Advisor value in today’s longevity economy. Investments & Wealth Institute. https://publications.investmentsandwealth.org/iwmonitor/march_april_2019/MobilePagedArticle.action?articleId=1480189
Coughlin, J. F., & Yoquinto, L. (Eds.). (2024). Longevity Hubs: Regional Innovation for Global Aging. The MIT Press.
Cserná, J., & Lee, S.-H. (2024). Prototyping future visions of vulnerable youth through design for longevity and gender equity. Diid — Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, 82. https://doi.org/10.30682/diid8224d
DiSalvo, C. (2022). Design as Democratic Inquiry: Putting Experimental Civics into Practice. The MIT Press.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation, & IDEO. (2016). The Circular Design Guide. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-design-guide/overview
Etkin, K. (2021). The AgeTech Revolution: A Book about the Intersection of Aging and Technology. New Degree Press.
Frederick, R. (2021). Right Place, Right Time: The Ultimate Guide to Choosing a Home for the Second Half of Life. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Friese, S. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS.ti (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Golden, S. (2022). Stage (Not Age): How to Understand and Serve People Over 60—the Fastest Growing, Most Dynamic Market in the World. Harvard Business Review Press.
Hecker, J., & Kalpokas, N. (2024). The Ultimate Guide to Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory. ATLAS.ti. https://atlasti.com/guides/qualitative-research-guide-part-2/grounded-theory#what-tools-will-help-with-grounded-theory
Hodara, S. E. (2024). Longevitytech: Bridging immersive media and design for longevity. Diid — Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, 82. https://doi.org/10.30682/diid8224f
Irving, P. H. (Ed.). (2014). The Upside of Aging: How Long Life Is Changing the World of Health, Work, Innovation, Policy, and Purpose. Wiley.
Lee, S.-H. (2024a). Touch: The allure of tangible design. Industrial Designers Society of America (IDSA), Spring 2024. https://www.idsa.org/news-publications/innovation-magazine/spring-2024/
Lee, S.-H. (2024b). Using boundary objects for enhanced design perspectives and insights. DesignWanted. https://designwanted.com/boundary-objects-design-perspectives-insights/
Lee, S.-H., Coughlin, J. F., Balmuth, A., Lee, C., Cerino, L., Yang, M., Klopfer, E., de Weck, O. L., & Ochsendorf, J. (2023). Designing longevity planning blocks through experimental participatory observation and interviews. IASDR 2023: Life-Changing Design. https://doi.org/10.21606/iasdr.2023.172
Lee, S.-H., Coughlin, J. F., Hodara, S., Yang, M. C., de Weck, O. L., Klopfer, E., & Ochsendorf, J. (2024). Design for longevity literature review in product lifecycle, financial planning, and gerontology. DRS2024: Boston. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.363
Lee, S.-H., Coughlin, J., Hodara, S., & Yang, M. (2024). Enhancing financial education for longevity through service design. DRS2024: Boston. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.364
Leigh Star, S. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624
Life-Centered Design School. (2022). The Life-Centered Design Guide to Slow Down. Life-Centered Design School.
Lomme, F. (Ed.) (with Larsen, L. B., Breu, C., Drucker, J., Ludovico, A., Krop, E., Pepin, J., Peters, R., & Sonneveld, M.). (2022). Can You Feel It?: Effectuating Tactility and Print in the Contemporary. Set Margins.
Lutz, D. (2022). The Life-Centered Design Guide. Damien Lutz.
Meroni, A., & Selloni, D. (2022). Service Design for Urban Commons. Springer.
Møller Haase, L., & Laursen, L. N. (2023). Designing for Longevity: Expert Strategies for Creating Long-Lasting Products. Routledge.
Norman, D. A. (2023). Design for a Better World: Meaningful, Sustainable, Humanity Centered. The MIT Press.
Scott, A. J. (2021). The longevity society. The Lancet Healthy Longevity, 2(12), e820–e827. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00247-6
Scott, A. J. (2024). The Longevity Imperative: How to Build a Healthier and More Productive Society to Support Our Longer Lives (1st U.S. ed.). Basic Books.
Shah, I. (2016). The Elephant in the Dark (British ed.). ISF Publishing.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
Sudjic, D. (2008). The Language of Things. Allen Lane/Penguin Books.
Turkle, S. (2007). Evocative Objects: Things We Think With. MIT Press.
United Nations. (2022). World Population Prospects 2022. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdf
WHO. (2024). Abuse of older people. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abuse-of-older-people