An inclusive design framework for novice students doing bioengineering and rehabilitation design

Main Article Content

Gloria Gomez
Sarah Wakes

Abstract

A framework was trialled in a bioengineering design course to assist and guide inclusive design around the theme of rehabilitation. Students were encouraged to adapt and use it as a touchstone at key points in their projects. Some students participating in the study had lived experience with rehabilitation and some also with inclusive design. The framework aids to develop empathic and care behaviours during a design process. For example, students understood that inclusive design solutions for preventing injury have to take into consideration people’s life situations (e.g. Designing for middle-age women with family obligations who are also the breadwinners) or a person with vision impairment have to be uncomplicated, flexible, non-stigmatising, reliable. The framework allowed the students to keep the health and wellbeing of their users at the forefront of the design process, which enhanced the design outcomes at the end of the project. Feedback via interviews and surveys on its effectiveness demonstrated how such a tool is needed. However, it was clear that it is not a self-learning tool and teacher intervention, explanation, and encouragement is required from the owner of the framework to be fully utilised.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Gloria Gomez, OceanBrowser Ltd, Dunedin, New Zealand

Gloria Gomez is co-founder at OceanBrowser Ltd, and honorary senior lecturer at the Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney. Gloria undertakes applied design research in novel educational practice with Bridging Design PrototypesTM. Fully functional rapid prototypes of new concept products are developed for gaining early entry to real settings to learn about a user community and their practices. Also, she undertakes research through teaching and supervision in visual design, social design, inclusive design, and medical education.

Sarah Wakes, Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Otago

Associate Professor Sarah Wakes joined the University of Otago in 2002. She has taught design to non-design postgraduate students in a bioengineering programme as well as industrial design, sustainability of materials and engineering design. Sarah is currently supervising students engaged in a variety of investigations such as examination of application of design thinking to SMEs and application of computational modelling.

References

Adelson, R. (2004). Universal design: Opening every door. Inside MS, 22(4), 30–34.
Altay, B., & Demirkan, H. (2014). Inclusive design: Developing students' knowledge and attitude through empathic modelling. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(2), 196–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.764933
Brandt, E., & Grunnet, C. (2000 28 Nov – 1 Dec). Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design. In T. Cherkasky, J. Greenbaum, P. Mambrey and J. K. Pors (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Biennial Participatory Design Conference 2000, November 28 - December 1, 2000, New York, USA. http://ojs.ruc.dk/index.php/pdc/article/view/188
BSI. (2005). New British Standard addresses the need for inclusive design https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/about-bsi/media-centre/press-releases/2005/2/New-British-Standard-addresses-the-need-for-inclusive-design/
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8(2), 5–21.
Chiang, P. P. (2009). The global mapping of low vision services [PhD Thesis, The University of Melbourne]. Australia. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/35343
Clarkson, P. J., Coleman, R., Keates, S., & Lebbon, C. (2003). Inclusive design: Design for the whole population. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0001-0
Clarkson, P. J., Coleman, R., Hosking, I., & Waller, S. (2007). Inclusive design toolkit. University of Cambridge.
Coleman, R. (2006). From margins to mainstream: Why inclusive design is better design. The Ergonomics Society Annual Lecture. Retrieved February 10, 2014, from http://www.hhc.rca.ac.uk/cms/files/ergsoclecture06.pdf
Colvin, M. (2009). An Effective Design Process for the Successful Development of Medical Devices. In: D. Zhou, E. Greenbaum (Eds.) Implantable Neural Prostheses 2. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98120-8_11
Conradie, P., De Marez, L., & Saldien, J. (2016). User consultation during the fuzzy front end: evaluating student’s design outcomes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 27(2017), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9361-4
Contreras, V. E., Gomez, G., & Navarro-Newball, A. A. (2019, 18-19 Nov). Towards the gamification of assistive technology for professionals with severe impairments. In 2019 International Conference on Virtual Reality and Visualization (ICVRV), Hong Kong, China. 176–179. https://doi.org/10.1109/icvrv47840.2019.00041
Dong, H. (2010). Strategies for teaching inclusive design. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(2-3), 237–251.
Edwards, A. (2001). Qualitative designs and analysis. In G. MacNaughton, S. A. Rolfe, & I. Siraj-Blatchford (Eds.), Doing early childhood research: International perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 117–135). Alen & Unwin.
Gomez, G., & Wakes, S. (2020). A framework to support inclusive design teaching and product evaluation: Application in overcoming barriers in food preparation for elderly visual impaired people. In F. Tosi, A. Serra, A. Brischetto, & E. Iacono (Eds.), Designing for Inclusion, Gamification and Learning Experience (pp. 366–374). Franco Angeli s.r.l.
Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2012). Reverse innovation: A global growth strategy that could pre-empt disruption at home. Strategy & leadership, 40(5), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571211257122
Harris, J. (2008). The use, application and role of advanced technologies in the lives of disabled people [Full Research Report ESRC End of Award Report](RES-062-23-0177). ESRC.
Harris, J. (2010). The use, role and application of advanced technology in the lives of disabled people in the UK. Disability & society, 25(4), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687591003755815
Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design. (2016). Designing with people. Retrieved 5th October 2016 from http://designingwithpeople.rca.ac.uk
Heylighen, A., & Bianchin, M. (2013). How does inclusive design relate to good design? Designing as a deliberate enterprise. Design Studies, 34, 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.05.002
Heywood, F. (2001). Money well spent: The effectiveness and value of housing adaptations. The Policy Press.
Keates, S., & Clarkson, P. J. (2003). Countering design exclusion: An introduction to inclusive design. In: J. Clarkson, S. Keates, R. Coleman, C. Lebbon (Eds.) Inclusive Design (pp. 438–453). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0001-0_27
Kolko, J. (2010). Abductive thinking and sensemaking: The drivers of design synthesis. Design issues, 26(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.15
Lovell, N. H. (2008). Design of appropriate medical technologies: Engineering social responsibility and awareness. In Career Development in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (pp. 374-376). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76495-5_46
Macdonald, A. S., & Teal, G. (2011, 18 - 20 April). Inspiring service innovation through co-design in public sector healthcare Include 2011, The Royal College of Arts, London. http://include11.kinetixevents.co.uk/rca/rca2011/paper_final/F399_1455.PDF
McAdams, D. A., & Kostovich, V. (2011). A framework and representation for universal product design. International Journal of Design, 5(1), 29–42.
Money, A. G., Barnett, J., Kuljis, J., Craven, M. P., Martin, J. L., & Young, T. (2011). The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11(1), 15–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-15
Pourdehnad, J., Wexler, E. R., & Wilson, D. V. (2011). Systems & design thinking: A conceptual framework for their integration System Sciences 55th Annual Conference, Hull, UK.
Pullin, G. (2009). Design meets disability. MIT Press.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
Schiederig, T., Tietze, F., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Green innovation in technology and innovation management - an exploratory literature review. R & D management, 42(2), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00672.x
Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2001). An ethnographic approach to researching young children's learning. In G. MacNaughton, S. A. Rolfe, & I. Siraj-Blatchford (Eds.), Doing early childhood research: international perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 193-207). Alen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003115397-16
Thoolen, F., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2011, April 18-10). Cooking with a visual impairment Include 2011, Royal College of Art, London. http://include11.kinetixevents.co.uk/rca/rca2011/paper_final/F404_2263.PDF
Tosi, F., Serra, A., Brischetto, A., & Iacono, E. (Eds.). (2020). Designing for inclusion, gamification and learning experience. Franco Angeli s.r.l.
Triggs, T., McAndrew, C., Akama, Y., & Choukeir, J. (2011). Telling your story: People and the Aylesbury Estate. Include 2011, 1–10.
UDI. (2014). Principles of universal design. UDI - The RL Mace Universal Design Institute. Retrieved 2 May 2022 from https://www.udinstitute.org/principles
World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/en/