Futuros Cero Neto más que humanos Diseño participativo disruptivo para un planeta sostenible y equitativo
Barra lateral del artículo
- sostenibilidad disruptiva
- diseño centrado más que en el ser humano
- infraestructuras de red cero
- inteligencia artificial
- futurizar participativamente
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Descargas
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Desde la industria hasta el mundo académico, pasando por la formulación de políticas, gran parte del discurso predominante sobre la sostenibilidad se centra en la transición hacia el llamado “futuro Cero Neto”. Esta visión se centra en la mitigación del cambio climático provocado por el hombre mediante la descarbonización de la sociedad industrial, principalmente a través de una mayor innovación y adopción de tecnologías emergentes. Este artículo argumenta que la investigación en diseño debe alejarse de estas narrativas reduccionistas y solucionistas, y desarrollar un enfoque disruptivo e inclusivo para el diseño de futuros Cero Netos. En respuesta a la complejidad del cambio climático, este artículo propone un nuevo marco conceptual que ayude a los profesionales del diseño a desafiar el insostenible statu quo tecnocéntrico. Basado en una confluencia de métodos especulativos, participativos y centrados más que en el ser humano, el documento describe cómo este enfoque puede estimular una estrecha colaboración entre diseñadores y redes de partes interesadas.
Detalles del artículo
Citas
Alcott, B. (2005). Jevons’ Paradox. Ecological Economics, Volume 54, Issue 1, 9-21, ISSN 0921-8009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020
Antonelli, P. (2022). Grow the Future: Visions of Biodesign. PrintNinja.
Auger, J. (2013). Speculative Design: Crafting the Speculation, Digital Creativity, 24;1, 11– 35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276
Bleecker, J. (2009). Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction. http://drbfw5wfjlxon.cloudfront.net/writing/DesignFiction_WebEdition.pdf
Bratton, B. H. (2019). The Terraforming. Strelka Press.
Brand, S. (2018). Pace Layering: How Complex Systems Learn and Keep Learning. Journal of Design and Science. https://doi.org/10.21428/7f2e5f08
Candy, S. (2010). The Futures of Everyday Life: Politics and the Design of Experiential Scenarios. [Doctoral dissertation in Political Science] University of Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1840.0248
Candy, S. & Dunagan, J. (2017). Designing An Experiential Scenario: The People Who Vanished, Futures, Volume 86, 2017, Pages 136-153, ISSN 0016-3287, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.006
Ceschin, F. & Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of Design for Sustainability: From Product Design to Design for System Innovations and Transitions. Design Studies, Volume 47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002
Crawford, K. (2021). The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press.
Crawford, K. (2024). Generative AI’s Environmental Costs Are Soaring — and Mostly Secret. Nature 626, 693 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00478-x
Dodge, J., Prewitt, T., Tachet Des Combes, R., Odmark, E., Schwartz, R., Strubell, E., Luccioni, A.S., Smith, N.A., DeCario, N., & Buchanan, W. (2022). Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’22), Korea, ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533234
Dunne, A. & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative Everything. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (n.d.). Adaptive Strategy for Circular Design: From ambition to action: an adaptive strategy for circular design. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/adaptive-strategy-for-circular-design/overview
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse. Duke University Press.
European Climate Law. (2021). Document 32021R1119. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021R1119
EU. (2020). Long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategy of the European Union and its Member States. https://unfccc.int/documents/210328
Freitag, C., Berners-Lee, M., Widdicks, K., Knowles, B., Blair G., & Friday, A. (2021). The Real Climate & Transformative Impact of ICT. Patterns, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100340
Fry, T. (2009). Defuturing: A New Design Philosophy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Galloway, A. (2017). More-than-Human Lab: Creative Ethnography After Human Exceptionalism. In L. Hjorth, H. Horst, A. Galloway, & G Bell (Eds.). The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography (pp. 496-503).
Giaccardi, E. & Redström, J. (2020). Technology and More-Than-Human Design, Design Issues, Vol36, Number 4, Autumn 2020, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00612
Gonzatto, R. F., van Amstel, F.M.C., Merkle, L.E., & Hartmann, T. (2013). The Ideology of the Future in Design Fictions. Digital Creativity, 24(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.772524
Hazas, M., & Nathan, L. (2017). Digital Technology & Sustainability: Engaging the Paradox. Routledge.
IPCC (2022a). FAQ 1.3 What is the difference between “net zero emissions” and “carbon neutrality”. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/faqs/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FAQ_Chapter_01.pdf
IPCC (2022b). The Evidence Is Clear: The Time for Action Is Now. We Can Halve Emissions by 2030. https://www.ipcc.ch/2022/04/04/ipcc-ar6-wgiii-pressrelease/
Jasanoff S. (2015). Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity. In: S. Jasanoff & S. Kim (Eds.) Dreamscapes of Modernity. University of Chicago Press.
Johnston, G. (2022). Energy Systems Catapult: Algorithm Governance. https://es.catapult.org.uk/report/algorithm-governance/
Kolbert, E. (2021). Under A White Sky: The Future of Nature. Bodley Head.
Konietzko, J. (2022, April 7). Moving Beyond Carbon Tunnel Vision with A Sustainability Data Strategy. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognizant/2022/04/07/moving-beyond-carbon-tunnel-vision-with-a-sustainability-data-strategy
Kozubaev, S. (2018). Futures As Design: Explorations, Images, and Participations. Interactions, 25(2), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178554
Latour, B. (1996). On Interobjectivity. Mind, Culture and Activity 3(4): 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. The Sustainability Institute. https://mchwdc.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Leverage-Points_Places-to-Intervene-in-a-System-Meadows.pdf
Nicenbolm, I., Giaccardi, E., Søndergaard, M. L. J., Reddy, A. V., Strengers, Y., Pierce, J., & Redström, J. (2020). More-Than-Human Design and AI: In Conversation with Agents. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS' 20 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 397–400. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395912
Norman, D. (1998). The Invisible Computer. MIT Press.
Papanek, V. (1971). Design for the Real World. St Albarns: Paladin.
Peach, K. & Smith, L. (2022). Participatory Futures: Reimagining the City Together. In Engle, J., Agyeman, J., & Chung-Tiam-Fook, T. (Eds.). (2022). Sacred Civics: Building Seven Generation Cities (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003199816
Price, C. (1966). Technology Is The Answer, But What Was The Question? Public lecture.
Rittel, H. W. J. & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155, 155–169, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Rozite, V., Miller, J., & Oh, S. (2023, November 2), Why AI and Energy Are the New Power Couple, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/commentaries/why-ai-and-energy-are-the-new-power-couple
Sanders, E. B. N. & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, Toolkits and Prototypes: Three Approaches to Making in Codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered. Abacus.
Sevaldson, B. (2011). GIGA-Mapping: Visualisation for complexity and systems thinking in design., Nordes 2011 - Making Design Matter, 29 - 31 May, School of Art & Design, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland. https://doi.org/10.21606/nordes.2011.015
Simon, H. A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stead, M. (2024). More-than-Human Making: Crafting Pedagogic Engagement Tools to Accelerate Sustainable Technology Transitions. Workshop paper presented at DIS '24: Designing Interactive Systems Conference, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark, July 2024. ACM.
Stead, M., Blaney, A., Gradinar, A., Richards, D., & Bayar, S. (2021). Design for Terra-Reforming: Prototyping Environmentally Responsible Socio-technical Futures. In 14th International Conference of the European Academy of Design: Safe Harbours for Design Research. https://doi.org/10.5151/ead2021-179
Stead, M. & Coulton, P. (2022). A more-than-human right-to-repair, in Lockton, D., Lenzi, S., Hekkert, P., Oak, A., Sádaba, J., Lloyd, P. (eds.), DRS2022: Bilbao, 25 June - 3 July, Bilbao, Spain. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.718
Stead, M., Coulton, P., Pilling, F., Gradinar, A., Pilling, M., & Forrester, I. (2022). More-than-Human-Data Interaction: Bridging Novel Design Research Approaches to Materialise and Foreground Data Sustainability. In Academic Mindtrek 2022 - Proceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (pp. 62-74). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3569219.3569344
Stead, M., Pilling, M., Macpherson-Pope, T., & Coulton, P. (2023). The Repair Shop 2049: Co-Designing Sustainable and Equitable Transitions for Smart Device Repair with and for Local Communities. In 5th Product Lifetimes and The Environment Conference Proceedings: PLATE 2023. https://www.plateconference.org/call-for-contributions-2/
Sweeting, B. & Sutherland, S. (2022). Possibilities and Practices of Systemic Design: Questions for the Next Decade of Relating Systems Thinking and Design. Proceedings of RSD, Brighton, UK. ISSN 2371-8404
Tang, A. & Nakarada-Kordic, I. (2022). Unpacking notions of community: Critical design and exhibition as a creative participatory research method. The Design Journal, 26(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2022.2144493
Thackara, J. (2005). In the Bubble. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Tharp, B. M. & Tharp, S. M. (2018). Discursive Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
UN (2015). Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
Vallor, S., & Vierkant, T. (2024). Find the Gap: AI, Responsible Agency and Vulnerability. Minds & Machines 34, 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09674-0
Vinsel, L., & Russell, A. L. (2020). The Innovation Delusion. Currency Books.
Wahl, D. C. (2016). Designing Regenerative Cultures. Triarchy Press.
Wallach, W. & Allen, C. (2008). Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford University Press, Inc., USA.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Retrieved March 6th, 2023, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
Welier, A. & McKenzie, D. (2017). Moving from Prototyping to “Provotyping”. Medium, 25 August. https://medium.com/@thestratosgroup/moving-from-prototyping-to-provotyping-cedf42a48e90
Widdicks, K., Lucivero, F., Samuel, G., Somavilla Croxatto, L., Tavares Smith, M., Ten Holter, C., Berners-Lee, M., Blair, G.S., Jirotka, M., Knowles, B., Sorrell, S., Borjesson Rivera, M., Cook, C., Coroama, V. C., Foxon, T.J., Hardy, J., Hilty, L.M., Hinterholzer, S., & Penzenstadler, B. (2023). Systems thinking and efficiency under emissions constraints: Addressing rebound effects in digital innovation and policy. Patterns, 4, 2, 100679, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.10067
Wong, R. Y. & Khovanskaya, V. (2018). Speculative Design in HCI: From Corporate Imaginations to Critical Orientations. In: Filimowicz, M., Tzankova, V. (eds.) New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2 - Methodologies Human–Computer Interaction Series, pp. 175-202. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_10