Bacterial Bioluminescence and Biophilic Design An Interdisciplinary Approach to Sensory Experiences in Urban Well-Being
Main Article Content
Abstract
Disconnection from nature is one of the main challenges of contemporary urban living, with negative effects on emotional and cognitive health. This study, carried out as part of a degree project in Design at the University of Chile, explored bacterial bioluminescence as an innovative resource in biophilic design, aimed at promoting emotional well-being in urban contexts. An experimental prototype was developed based on the ethical cultivation of Photobacterium, designed according to principles of biomimicry and biocollaboration. Validation was carried out through non-participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and emotional assessment surveys, complemented by electroencephalography (Emotiv Epoc EEG) and the PrEmo scale. The results showed that interaction with bioluminescence generated responses of awe, fascination, and calm, linked to processes of restorative contemplation, along with a sustained increase in levels of attention and relaxation. The integration of bacterial bioluminescence into the design not only offers an aesthetic and sustainable alternative, but also a sensory medium capable of mediating emotional and symbolic links with nature. This work also validates project-based research as a legitimate way to generate new knowledge that can be published under current academic standards.
Article Details
References
Archer, B. (1979). Design as a discipline. Design Studies, 1(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(79)90023-1
Aristizábal, S., Byun, K., Porter, P., Clements, N., Campanella, C., Li, L., Mullan, A., Ly, S., Senerat, A., Nenadic, I. Z., Browning, W. D., Loftness, V., & Bauer, B. (2021). Biophilic office design: Exploring the impact of a multisensory approach on human well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, 101682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101682
Barati, B., Karana, E., Pont, S., & van Dortmont, T. (2021). Living light interfaces: An exploration of bioluminescence aesthetics. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference: Nowhere and Everywhere (pp. 1215–1229). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462038
Brainard, G. C., & Hanifin, J. P. (2005). Photons, clocks, and consciousness. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 20(4), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730405278951
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., Hahn, K. S., Daily, G. C., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(28), 8567–8572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510459112
Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 patterns of biophilic design. Terrapin Bright Green. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/14-Patterns-of-Biophilic-Design-Terrapin-2014p.pdf
Cross, N. (2001). Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline versus Design Science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1511801
Desmet, P. M. A. (2002). Designing emotions [Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology]. Delft University Press. https://studiolab.ide.tudelft.nl/studiolab/desmet/files/2011/09/thesis-designingemotions.pdf
Falchi, F., Cinzano, P., Duriscoe, D., Kyba, C. C. M., Elvidge, C. D., Baugh, K., Portnov, B., Rybnikova, N., & Furgoni, R. (2016). The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness. Science Advances, 2(6), e1600377. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600377
Findeli, A. (2010). Searching for design research questions: Some conceptual clarifications. In R. Chow, W. Jonas & G. Joost (Eds.), Questions, Hypotheses & Conjectures: Discussions on Projects by Early Stage and Senior Design Researchers (pp. 286–303). iUniverse.
Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., & Stolterman, E. (2009). From design research to theory: Evidence of a maturing field. IASDR 2009: Proceedings of the International Association of Societies of Design Research Conference — Design, Rigor & Relevance (pp. 2889–2898). Seoul, South Korea.
Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5. https://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/id/eprint/384
Friedman, K. (2001). Creating design knowledge: From research into practice. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.25916/sut.26253722
Friedman, K. (2003). Theory construction in design research: Criteria, approaches, and methods. Design Studies, 24(6), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00039-5
Gu, J., Liu, H., & Lu, H. (2022). Can even a small amount of greenery be helpful in stress relief? A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 9778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169778
Guido, G., Piper, L., Prete, M. I., Mileti, A., & Trisolini, C. M. (2017). Effects of blue lighting in ambient and mobile settings on the intention to buy hedonic and utilitarian products. Psychology & Marketing, 34(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20984
Güiza Caicedo, L. (2009). La emoción como experiencia de diseño: Una exploración a través de productos interactivos. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Haddock, S. H. D., Moline, M. A., & Case, J. F. (2010). Bioluminescence in the sea. Annual Review of Marine Science, 2(1), 443–493. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081028
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
Hekkert, P. (2006). Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in product design. Psychology Science, 48(2), 157–172.
Horváth, I. (2007, August 28–31). Comparison of three methodological approaches of design research. DS 42: Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, 28.-31.07.2007, (pp. 361–362). Cité des Sciences et de l’Industrie, Paris, France.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Kellert, S. R. (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. John Wiley & Sons.
Kellert, S., & Calabrese, E. F. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. Biophilic Design Press. https://biophilicdesign.umn.edu/sites/biophilic-net-positive.umn.edu/files/2021-09/2015_Kellert%20_The_Practice_of_Biophilic_Design.pdf
Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Morgan Kaufmann.
Kotera, Y., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2020). Effects of Shinrin-Yoku (Forest Bathing) and nature therapy on mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(1), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00363-4
Kyba, C. C. M., Ruhtz, T., Fischer, J., & Hölker, F. (2017). Artificially lit surface of Earth at night increasing in radiance and extent. Science Advances, 3(e1701528), e1701528. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701528
LeGates, T. A., Fernandez, D. C., & Hattar, S. (2014). Light as a central modulator of circadian rhythms, sleep and affect. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(7), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3743
Liu, Z., Chen, X., Cui, H., Ma, Y., Gao, N., Li, X., Meng, X., Lin, H., Abudou, H., Guo, L., & Liu, Q. (2023). Green space exposure on depression and anxiety outcomes: A meta-analysis. Environmental Research, 231, 116303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116303
Manzini, E. (2009). New design knowledge. Design Studies, 30(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001
Max-Neef, M. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014
Myers, W. (2012). Bio design: Nature, science, creativity. Thames & Hudson.
Muratovski, G. (2022). Research for designers: A guide to methods and practice (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. SUNY Press.
Ofer, N., Bell, F., & Alistar, M. (2021, June 28–July 2). Designing direct interactions with bioluminescent algae. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’21) (pp. 1–13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462090
Qurraie, B. S., & Bayram, S. (2025). Exploring the impact of biophilic design: A research review. ENG Transactions, 6(1), 1–8. https://engtransactions.com/viewmore.php?pid=235
Rabbassum, R. R., & Park, J. (2024). Development of a building evaluation framework for biophilic design in architecture. Buildings, 14(10), Article 3254. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103254
Rao, S., Good, J., & Alavi, H. (2025). Lessons from biophilic design: Rethinking affective interaction design in built environments. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.19867
Redström, J. (2008). RE: Definitions of use. Design Studies, 29(4), 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.05.001
Richardson, M. (2025). Modelling Nature Connectedness Within Environmental Systems: Human-Nature Relationships from 1800 to 2020 and Beyond. Earth, 6(3), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth6030082
Stainbrook, E. (1973). Man's psychic need for nature. National Parks and Conservation Magazine, 47(9), 22–23. https://npshistory.com/npca/magazine/sep-1973.pdf
Tjia, V. A. S., Srinaga, F., & Thiodore, J. (2024). Development of an older adult community centre based on biophilic architecture principles to improve the quality of life. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1361(1), 012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1361/1/012053
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision. United Nations. https://population.un.org/wup/assets/WUP2014-Report.pdf
Wilson, E. O. (1986). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Harvard University Press
Yin, J., Zhu, S., & Yuan, C. (2024). Health impacts of biophilic design from a multisensory interaction perspective. Land, 13(9), 1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091448
Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2021). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11, 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006
Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2008). The role of design artifacts in design theory construction. Artifact, 2(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460802276893
