Conflict of powers between the executive branch and first instance tribunals
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Conflict of powers
constitutional amendment
unconstitutionality
ipso facto abrogation
Tribunal’s Code

Categories

How to Cite

García, C. . (2013). Conflict of powers between the executive branch and first instance tribunals: Unconstitutionality or ipso facto abrogation of the final paragraph of article 191 of the tribunals’ code?. Derecho Público Iberoamericano, (3), 109–116. Retrieved from https://revistas.udd.cl/index.php/RDPI/article/view/35

Abstract

The Chilean Supreme Court authority to decide the conflicts of power between the Executive branch and first instance tribunals, was given to the Constitutional Court by the 2005 constitutional amendment. In spite of the new constitutional clause, the Congress has not adapted the final paragraph of article 191 of the Tribunal’s Code, which regulates the issue. Therefore, the statutory provision is now incompatible with the new constitutional regulation. However, the Supreme Court has applied that legal provision, despite of its lack of constitutional validity. Thus, according to the Supreme Court, the conflicts of power cannot be solved by the Constitutional Court and, also, the final paragraph of article 191 of the Tribunal’s Code cannot be subject to judicial review.

PDF (Español (España))

References

Historia de la Ley de Reforma Constitucional N° 20.050, que modifica la composición y atribuciones del Congreso Nacional, la aprobación de los tratados internacionales, la integración y funciones del Tribunal Constitucional y otras materias que indica, 2005.

Ley N° 16.752, que fija organización y funciones y establece disposiciones generales a la Dirección General de Aeronáutica Civil, 1968.

TC, sentencias roles 472, 702, 703, 704, 705, y 991

Corte Suprema, (2010), rol 1018-09

Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.