Jurisprudence comments

All Items

Eduardo Soto Kloss
283-296
About the opinions of the Comptroller's Office: A supreme error is a supreme error
Rodrigo Céspedes Proto
265-272
About the right to education: Commentary to the sentence Laurie Sáez with Colegio San José Ltda.
Rodrigo Céspedes Proto
259-265
Administration, heterotutelage and res judicata in the 19th century: The "Despoilment" case (1874)
Andrea Iñiguez Manso
81-101
Affirmative actions in college admissions: U.S. Supreme Court decision in students for fair admission inc. V. President and fellows of Harvard College
https://doi.org/10.52611/rdpi.num26.2025.1332
Eduardo Soto Kloss
235-252
An auditor for higher education institutions: Role 2.731/24.10.2014 of the Constitutional Court
Henry Boys Loeb
253-272
Analysis of sentence 3681-17: The Constitutional Court faced with the dual criminal prosecution system in force in Chile
Eduardo Soto Kloss
181-187
Appeal for protection against the removal of a public official: Pérez Gutiérrez Dorothy v. Bermúdez Soto Jorge, Santiago Court of Appeals October 16, 2018, Supreme Court November 30, 2018
Nicolás Rodríguez Rioseco, Alejandro Gómez Sotomayor
211-229
Appeal for protection and the (incorrect) application of the proportionality test to the violation of 19 N°4 by security cameras: San Miguel Court of Appeals, judgment Rol P-3441-2016, March 20, 2017, Supreme Court, judgment Rol P-39-2017, December 19, 2016
Eduardo Soto Kloss
251-258
Arbitrariness and the principle of legality in the 19th century: Apostolic Vicar of Antofagasta (1905)
Eduardo Soto Kloss
257-264
Case "Dialized": Commentary to the sentence of the Supreme Court, Obregon del Camino and others with FONASA, Rol 12.700-2013, of December 23, 2013
Jaime Elgueta
285-311
Case Mémoli vs. Argentina: Judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Eduardo Soto Kloss
265-270
Child abuse in municipal school: Commentary to the sentence of the Supreme Court, NN and others with Municipality of San Pedro de La Paz, Rol 3071-2013, of November 21, 2013
Héctor Pérez Bonifaz
369-392
Collusion: A jurisprudential analysis
Juan Ignacio Contardo González
203-237
Commentary on the sentence SERNAC with Cencosud: Supreme Court (2013) Role 12.355-2011/24 April 2013
Eduardo Soto Kloss
205-213
Constitutional Court and Consumer Rights: Commentary on Ruling No. 4012.2017 of January 18, 2018, on the bill amending Law No. 19.496 on the protection of consumer rights
Cristian Román Cordero
221-241
Contraloría General de la República: Does it have the authority to remove a mayor from office for misuse of a government vehicle, pursuant to Decree-Law 799?
https://doi.org/10.52611/rdpi.num28.2026.1792
Eduardo Soto Kloss
205-213
Curtidos Bas S.A.'s claim of inapplicability: The ruling that declared subsection 2 of article 62 of DFL 458/1976 unconstitutional
Eduardo Soto Kloss
233-240
De Dompierre De Chaufepié c/ Servicio de Registro Civil e Identificación: Supreme Court 19.11.2015. Court of Appeals of Santiago 21.8.2015
Cristian Román Cordero
149-180
Disciplinary law and marital infidelity: Commentary on Supreme Court Ruling Rol N°17.750-2019
https://doi.org/10.52611/rdpi.num23.2023.1051
Tomás Henríquez C.
273-288
Does freedom of conscience and free exercise of religion exist for legal persons? Some considerations in light of the "Hobby Lobby" sentence
Rodrigo Cespedes Proto, Universidad Federal de Pará, Brasi
207-215
Extradition and General Principles of International Law: A 19th Century Judgment
https://doi.org/10.52611/rdpi.num26.2025.1172
José Manuel Díaz de Valdés Juliá
239-252
First Sentence Anti-Discrimination Law: Zapata y De la Fuente with Sociedad Comercial Marín Limitada
Nicolás Enteiche Rosales
283-288
From the discretionary constitutional faculty of the President of the Republic: Commentary on the Constitutional Court's sentence No. 1849 of May 12, 2011
Juan Ignacio Contardo
179-189
Illegality of online casinos and sports betting sites
https://doi.org/10.52611/rdpi.num24.2024.1080
Pilar Arellano Gómez
347-368
Inadmissibility of the requirement of inapplicability due to lack of reasonable grounds: Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court